Runtime upgrade to version 9241

Runtime upgrade to version 9240

Runtime upgrade to verison 9233

Tech. Comm. motion 40

Tech. Comm. motion 39

Runtime upgrade to version 9231

Tech. Comm. motion 37

Runtime upgrade to version 9223

- Litentry is changing its name to Heima Network and its token from LIT to HEI.
- The change is to focus on making it easier for users to move between different blockchains.
- They will update all their branding and work with exchanges to make the switch smooth.
- They are also changing how they manage their funds to make things more transparent.
- The total number of tokens will stay the same, but more will be available for use.
- They plan to create new ways for people to trade HEI tokens.
- The community is asked to vote on these changes to help the network grow.

Council motion #48: Rebranding with Tokenomics Change

Treasury spend proposal for Subsquare/statescan maintenance 2024

Runtime upgrade to version 9210

Runtime upgrade to version 9202

Litentry is making changes to its infrastructure framework by embedding the DID service they have already built into it. This is not a big shift but an extension. 
They are using a referendum to record LIT holders' opinions towards this move. 
The referendum is a strategic vote and the result will be a system remark.

Vote for Litentry's strategic move: from DID to Chain Abstraction

Runtime upgrade to version 9201

Runtime upgrade to version 9200

Reduce the token bridge fee to 8 LIT 

Litmus is going to be discontinued.
The balance of all Litmus accounts will be moved to the matching Litentry accounts.
476,293.288 LIT is the total issuance on Litmus.
The transfer will involve minting LIT tokens on a Litentry team member account and distributing the due balance of each Litmus account to its corresponding Litentry account via balance transfer.
The process is public and transparent.

Transfer all users' balance from Litmus accounts to Litentry accounts

Runtime upgrade to 9195

IdentityHub Airdrop 26050 LIT

Runtime upgrade to 9194

Runtime upgrade to 9193

Fix the parachainStaking.candidatePool() storage

Untitled - motion #21

Batch operation to revert wrongly distributed staking rewards

Untitled - motion #19

proposalHash

votingPeriod

delay

calls

maybeConfig

palletNameBytes

functionNameBytes

mode

Tech. Comm. Proposals