Please refer to this medium article for the context.
To underscore the change: DID and ChainAbstraction are two connected concepts. We try to embed the DID service that we've already built into a bigger infrastructure framework, so it should be seen as an extension instead of an orthogonal shift.
This motion(referendum) is used to record LIT holders' opinions towards this move, it's a stategic vote, thus the execution result is just a system.remark
Litentry is making changes to its infrastructure framework by embedding the DID service they have already built into it. This is not a big shift but an extension. They are using a referendum to record LIT holders' opinions towards this move. The referendum is a strategic vote and the result will be a system remark.